hit counter

  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Time Traveler's Wife
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


The Time Traveler's Wife

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
SFReader View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
SFReader Webmaster

Joined: Feb-26-2015
Status: Offline
Points: 521
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SFReader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Time Traveler's Wife
    Posted: Mar-02-2015 at 7:18am
The Time Traveler's Wife 
Starring Eric Bana and Rachel McAdams
Directed by Robert Schwentke
Reviewed by S.J. Higbee
Rating: (3/5) 

Released in the summer of 2009, The Time Traveler's Wife is based on Audrey Niffenegger's bestselling book of the same name, which I felt was an interesting, nuanced examination of a much hackneyed subject. There was a lot of anticipation around the film, given Brad Pitt's involvement as one of the producers - especially after the postponement of the original release date back in 2008.The Time Traveler's Wife follows the fortunes of Clare and Henry after they meet in a library. However, this is far from being an everyday romance. Henry has a genetic condition causing him to travel in time - which makes it sound far more sedate and orderly than it turns out to be. Whenever he is stressed or upset, poor Henry is yanked out of his life and deposited elsewhere, minus his clothes. And that initial meeting in the library isn't your average girl meets boy and falls in love, either. As their eyes meet, Clare lights up in delighted recognition--it turns out that she's known Henry since she was a little girl as he regularly turned up in the meadow behind her house all through her life during his time-travelling episodes. Loving Henry comes at a very high price, however. They never know exactly when Henry will disappear--or reappear. And then there's the unpleasant fact that Clare has never seen him any older than his early 40's. 

Throughout the film, Bana and McAdams both give solid performances and as the story winds to its climax, there are moments of real emotion. The fading palmprint of Henry's hand on the window near the end, is powerful and moving. However, I did feel the script didn't really give these two very capable actors a chance to really dig deep. There are some huge subjects dealt with in the film and somehow, the dialogue seemed to slide over the surface. The odd touches of humour were effective, and I did wonder whether the screenwriter was hankering to turn this into a classic romantic comedy. He certainly did a real makeover on Henry's difficulties. Henry isn't nearly raggedly fraught enough as he finds himself continually sliding into another timeline, away from the family he loves. The supporting cast all do an excellent job and I particularly enjoyed Fiona Reid's splendid portrayal of Clare's tactless mother, while Ron Livingstone's performance as Gomez is entirely satisfactory, given the limited scope of the role. 

The cinematography is accomplished, with a deft use of lighting to underline the increasing sense of crisis, with the film's settings staying very true to the book. In fact, I was surprised at just how faithful the film was to the fragmented storyline--and here, for me, lies a major problem. I found myself continually recalling scenes from the book that underscored a particular emotion or issue touched on in the film. Like the book, the film skips between different timelines. However, unlike the book, we do not have the benefit of the strong narrative voice to steer us through, while the few grey hairs Bana displays to give us a clue as to which Henry we are watching are not a sufficiently strong visual prompt. I didn't get confused, but I have a hunch that is because I'd already read the book. I believe that a voice over a la Benjamin Button by either Henry or Clare would have given the viewer a much better sense of the timeline and a sharper feel for the characters.

While we get the odd nod to one of the issues raised by the book--'I never had a choice!' McAdams yells as an infuriated Clare--the film seems too intent on conveying a classic Hollywood 'love conquers all' message. Whereas the book was far more interestingly ambivalent, particularly at the end. 

All in all, while The Time Traveler's Wife certainly doesn't deserve the panning it has had from certain directions, neither is it the real masterpiece it could have been. The limited emotional range of the screenplay and ultimate reliance on old Hollywood clich's has sold the actors and the audience short. 





Edited by SFReader - Jul-06-2016 at 1:35pm
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.03
Copyright ©2001-2015 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.064 seconds.