The original version of this page can be found at : http://forum.sfreader.com/default.aspx?f=11&m=58238
Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 11/13/2007 10:34 PM
Think we might need another one? I've noticed a lot of people on YouTube seem to think so.
devil  
 
 
'Bout time there was a candidate who hates the IRS as much as I do. With any luck we won't have to choose between Galactus and Apocalypse this coming election.


Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : Edward Knight - 11/16/2007 10:05 PM
Man, do I ever hate taxes. I'd drive to Boston with a truck load of Lipton if I thought it would do any good. I can't watch the video from my home computer (dialup is just too darn slow for video) and I'm not sure what's on it. But I do hate taxes.


Edward Knight
Editor
Journey Books Publishing
Order our newest anthology, Unparalleled Journeys II, now at:
http://www.journeybookspublishing.com


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 11/17/2007 8:09 PM

Ron Paul supporters did a November 5th fund drive in honor of the movie, V for Vendetta, and he wound up with 4.3 million in a single day. They plan to do an even bigger one on Dec. 15th in honor of the Boston Tea Party.

Oh, and with Ron Paul, you won't have to worry about those taxes, because he plans to eliminate the IRS and replace it with nothing. Like I said, my kinda candidate. cool


Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : Edward Knight - 11/18/2007 7:48 PM
Well, if you've studied much history, Washington, Adams, and most certainly Jefferson all felt the same way. Jefferson was under a great deal of pressure to raise taxes in order to pay for a standing army and a navy. He refused to pay for either, instead leaving the nation's defenses up to individual state militias and a sort of makeshift coast gaurd. I believe Madison was the first to start a standing military and navy. It was under his administration that the US built the first six ships in our navy. And that required higher taxes. That stuff did come in handy around 1812 when the British were impressing US citizens into naval duty and boarding our merchant ships without cause.

I do believe that some taxes are a necessary evil. But we've gone way overboard in this country. And the rich do not pay their fair share. For that matter, neither do the poor. An unfair portion of the burden is carried by the working class American, and that ticks me off. I'm a supporter of a flat income tax with no wiggle room. You make 10k you pay 1k. You make 1 million, you pay 100,000. 10% seems fair, certainly no more. Then each state should get a portion of that (2-3% of the amount paid by state residents, maybe) and that's it. No sales tax, property tax, no wheel tax, fuel tax, hunting/fishing licenses... nothing else.  If everybody pays 10% there should be enough to go around. If not, the government is spending too much (hence, balanced budget).
 
We have to pay for roads, education, some degree of military defense... I'm willing to pay my part for the things that must be paid for and willing to pay taxes to do it. But our goverment takes too much and spends too much.


Edward Knight
Editor
Journey Books Publishing
Order our newest anthology, Unparalleled Journeys II, now at:
http://www.journeybookspublishing.com


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 11/18/2007 9:36 PM

I had a big long post, and wouldn't you know it, the blasted wireless wonked out on me. mad

Check out www.ronpaul2008.com

You might not agree with everything about the guy, but I bet you'll like him way better than any of the current candidates. People from all political persuasions are rallying to the guy: conservatives, liberals, Libertarians, Democrats, Republicans, hehe even anarchists like me. devil


Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : Edward Knight - 11/19/2007 8:42 AM
I'm ready for a strong third party candidate. I don't like any of the current choices. I'll check this guy out. Thanks.


Edward Knight
Editor
Journey Books Publishing
Order our newest anthology, Unparalleled Journeys II, now at:
http://www.journeybookspublishing.com


Posted By : erazmus - 11/25/2007 10:53 PM
I have to say I like Ron Pau's ideas. But a caveat-- I believe in fedralism . . . tha means the individual states as sovreign entities not subordinate to a central national authority. That also means states not reliant on the national governmant for their wherewithal, and not answerable to it for those areas of government not clearly under the ageis of the national government. That means law enforcement, education, etc.
Paul's weakness with his tax plan is that he lumps the IRS and the US government in with that of the fifty states. Even if he were elected president with a clear majority of support in congress, that congress would not have the authority to implement his plan.
Thus, he's a screwball. No matter how nice his ideas sound.
Mike


Michael D. Turner
"Psyched Up" in _Turn the other Chick_-ed. E. Friesner-Baen books
www.baen.com
"Dutchman Rescue"in Continuum SF #6
www.continuumsciencefiction.com/orders.htm

"An Incident at Black Tongue Tavern" in _Bash Down the Door and Slice Open the Badguy_ from Fantasist Enterprises:

www.fantasistent.com/books/anthologies/BASH.php
"Stains" in Tales of the Talisman 3-1 www.zianet.com/hadrosaur/index.html
"Slushpiles" in Between the Kisses
www.samsdotpublishing.com/betweenkisses/TurnerSlushPileS.htm


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 11/26/2007 7:56 PM

Even though the Supreme Court stated in 2003 that the 16th Amendment was never ratified by the required number of states to make it a legal amendment? Even though the Tax Code uses the term "voluntary compliance" instead of "mandatory requirement"? Even though three Supreme Court Rulings in 1916, 1917, and 1919 (none of which have been overturned) stated that the 16th Amendment does not give the government any new powers of taxation not already allowed by the Constitution and that a direct, unapportioned tax is Unconstitutional?

Also the Supreme Court defined income in the Constitution as Capital Gains and defined monies earned from labor or a service to be private property.

And why have so few been able to fight the IRS over this issue? Well, kind of hard to hire a good lawyer when the IRS just siezes everything you own and the smaller courts don't allow you to defend yourself with the above Supreme Court rulings.

Given the dubious nature of its legality, the IRS can be done away with by a single executive order.
 
Especially since they can never show a law that requires you to pay it in the first place. Everyone who asks gets ignored.


Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 11/26/2007 8:04 PM

And the word you're looking for to describe what you believe in (which, by the way, is also the Constitutional view) is Anti-Federalism. Federalism supports a large central government at the expense of the individual States. Anti-Federalism supports a small central government and allows the States their Constitutional rights.

When Ron Paul talks about the Fed, he's talking about the Federal government, not the State governments. And other times he's just referring to the Federal Reserve System in particular.

 

 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : erazmus - 11/27/2007 12:29 PM
Sorry, very late for me when I wrote. He's welcome to abolish the IRS, but until his like have control of the executive branch, fighting the IRS in court will find you in the position of the Supreme Court in the days of Andy Jackson-- Deciding an issue and enforcing the decision are two different things.
Mike


Michael D. Turner
"Psyched Up" in _Turn the other Chick_-ed. E. Friesner-Baen books
www.baen.com
"Dutchman Rescue"in Continuum SF #6
www.continuumsciencefiction.com/orders.htm

"An Incident at Black Tongue Tavern" in _Bash Down the Door and Slice Open the Badguy_ from Fantasist Enterprises:

www.fantasistent.com/books/anthologies/BASH.php
"Stains" in Tales of the Talisman 3-1 www.zianet.com/hadrosaur/index.html
"Slushpiles" in Between the Kisses
www.samsdotpublishing.com/betweenkisses/TurnerSlushPileS.htm


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 11/27/2007 6:36 PM

I definitely agree with you on that.

In addition to following RP's campaign, me (and many of his supporters) are paying close attention to which politicians come out and endorse him, etc. whether they be Repubs, Dems, Libertarians or whichever, so we can make a list on who to vote for if any of them decide to run for Congress or Senate, etc. (or try to keep in if they're already there).

I doubt he'll accomplish everything he wants to while in office (few Presidents ever do), but I look at it this way:
 
What's the alternative other than an all-out violent overthrow before our country turns into Nazi Germany? Which might be likely, 'cause Bush and Congress has managed to do something no President in history was ever stupid enough to do (other than pass draconic laws and executive orders that would've made Hitler as giddy as a schoolboy)--unite %80 of the country against them, including all the militias.
 
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : BethS - 11/29/2007 9:10 AM
EdK said...
 And the rich do not pay their fair share.
 
Define "rich," if you would. Income above what level?
 
~Beth

Posted By : tchernabyelo - 11/29/2007 1:21 PM
Scott M. Sandridge said...
I doubt he'll accomplish everything he wants to while in office (few Presidents ever do), but I look at it this way:
 
What's the alternative other than an all-out violent overthrow before our country turns into Nazi Germany?  
 

Um, there are very few trends I see in terms of the US turning into anything remotely resembling Nazi Germany.   Nazi Germany basically put its entire military-industrial complex at the disposal of the government.   What the US has done in the post-Reagan, post-Cold War years is the percise opposite of that.

America has a lot of problems - trade deficit, personal debt, resource shortages - but the idea that removing the IRS will somehow be an improvement is... interesting.   If you want to live in a rehash of the 18th century, some balmy dream of the frontier/pioneer nation of omni-competent self-reliant outdoorsmen, yes, get rid of taxation.   If you actually want to live in a world with electricity and running water, you may find things need to be handled a little differently.

 

 


Brian Dolton
 
Yi Qin stories:
"The Box Of Beautiful Things" - IGMS#3
"The Man Who Was Never Afraid" - Abyss and Apex #20
"Where No Wind Blows" - Staffs & Starships #2 (forthcoming)
"What The Sea Refuses" - Black Gate (forthcoming)
"At Blue Crane Falls" - Abyss and Apex (forthcoming)
"What The Heart Bears" - Black Gate (forthcoming)
 
Other Land Of Wind And Ghosts stories:
"The Dragon Path" - Fictitious Force (forthcoming)
"Three Out Of Four" - Sorcerous Signals (forthcoming)
 
Stories in other settings:
"The Unicorn Hunter" - OG's Speculative Fiction #8
"When Winter Came" - ASIM#32 (forthcoming)
"Cold Fire" - Flashing Swords (forthcoming)
"Call Centre" - Necrotic Tissue (forthcoming)


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 11/29/2007 6:27 PM

Google the following, tchernabyelo:

Project for a New American Century

Security and Prosperity Partnership for North America

Building the North American Community

North American Union

the Amero

Patriot Act I

Patriot Act II

Military Commisions Act

There's also a crapload of executive orders whose numbers I can't remember off the top of my head. Not all forms of fascism resembles Nazi Germany exactly.

"Real ID" Act

RFID Chips

Also check out the following documentaries at Google Video:
 
America: Freedom to Fascism by Aaron Russo
 
and
 
Money Masters (How International Bankers Took Over America) by William Still
 
After you check all that out, then come tell me you still want to pay your Income Tax.
 

"Fascism should be called Corporatism, because it's the perfect partnership between the corporations and the State." -- Benito Mussolini

 



Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 11/29/2007 6:33 PM
BethS said...
EdK said...
 And the rich do not pay their fair share.
 
Define "rich," if you would. Income above what level?
 
~Beth
Since when did the rich ever bother with "income"? smilewinkgrin


Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : BethS - 11/29/2007 9:13 PM
Scott M. Sandridge said...
BethS said...
EdK said...
 And the rich do not pay their fair share.
 
Define "rich," if you would. Income above what level?
 
~Beth
Since when did the rich ever bother with "income"? smilewinkgrin

Well, but that's why I want him to define it. People have different ideas of what constitutes rich.
 
Excluding those who are wealthy enough to live off capital gains and other non-traditional sources of income, the vast majority of all the federal income tax in the US is paid by the upper wage earners.
 
~Beth

Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 11/29/2007 9:55 PM
BethS said...
Scott M. Sandridge said...
BethS said...
EdK said...
 And the rich do not pay their fair share.
 
Define "rich," if you would. Income above what level?
 
~Beth
Since when did the rich ever bother with "income"? smilewinkgrin

Well, but that's why I want him to define it. People have different ideas of what constitutes rich.
 
Excluding those who are wealthy enough to live off capital gains and other non-traditional sources of income, the vast majority of all the federal income tax in the US is paid by the upper wage earners.
 
~Beth
 
Yep. But that's only half of the one-two punch being used to eliminate the Middle Class. The other half is deliberately inflating the dollar until its value eventually reaches 0. Currently, The Federal Reserve Note is only worth 5 cents compared to what its value was when first introduced in 1913.
 
Hence why there's been talk (rarely) in the market-news shows of a "new currency" soon to be introduced: the Amero, to be the standard currency for United States, Canada, and Mexico. But of course, like our current Dollar, it won't be backed by anything of real tangible value, either.
 
The exact same system that's been used since the first empires were formed:
 
Create a problem (or sometimes just take advantage of one already created)
Wait for the expected reaction
Then offer the "solution"
 
But the Amero "solution" will be offered at the expense of trading our Constitution for a new one. One where your rights are granted by Government instead of being inalienable. And where a NAU tribunal court will have jurisdiction over our Supreme Court.
 
And all on our wonderful tax dollars.
 
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 12/3/2007 9:11 PM

Here's another interesting thing to check out:

http://www.ronpauldvdproject.com/themovie.php

Thie above link is without all my "conspiracy theory" stuff. smilewinkgrin

Y'know, there used to be a time when I never believed in conspiracies. But that was before I read the PNAC document and watched some speeches at CFR meetings. When they overtly use terms like Pax Americana and New World Order, then you know things are screwed up.

There is some good news, though. Many States have rejected accepting the National ID card, and a whole bunch of cities in Texas have flat-out stated that they will not allow the NAFTA Superhighway to go through their jurisdictions. And Congress voted unanimously to put a hold on the North American Union plan. Apparently, they're ticked that Bush tried to form the NAU without their knowledge or approval.


Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : tchernabyelo - 12/7/2007 9:10 AM
Scott M. Sandridge said...

Not all forms of fascism resembles Nazi Germany exactly.


Well, no, certainly not.   But your earlier post specifically referred to the US turning into Nazi Germany, which is what I was taking issue with.   There's no doubt that there are trends in the US moving towards centralism, but there's equally no doubt that there are trends away from that as well.   Indeed, the more the Republican party moves to align itself with the Neo-Con world-view, the more it loses the support of the more libertarian elements of its base.   There is a real possibility of a significant split in Republican grass-roots support, which might well counter the disadvantage the Democrats have in trying to get Hillary or Barack elected (I do find it deperssing that in the World's Greatest Democracy, a woman is still seen as unelectable by the majority of voters - if Pakistan can have a female head of state, which it id, then surely the US could manage it.
 
I am aware of many of the issue you cite, though some were new to me (the "Amero", for instance, but it is a logical extensian of the NAU planners).   
 
Asking me whether I still want to pay my taxes, however, is a side note.   I don't live in the US.   I do live in the UK, though, where tax money goes to (and flows back from) the European Parliament and Commission.   So I do know something about the operation of federal supra-states, and I freely admit that the EU is NOT run in a fashion that I consider adequately democratic.   
 
But it isn't about where your tax dollars go.   It's about who you choose to elect and how they represent your interests.   


Brian Dolton
 
Yi Qin stories:
"The Box Of Beautiful Things" - IGMS#3
"The Man Who Was Never Afraid" - Abyss and Apex #20
"Where No Wind Blows" - Staffs & Starships #2 (forthcoming)
"What The Sea Refuses" - Black Gate (forthcoming)
"At Blue Crane Falls" - Abyss and Apex (forthcoming)
"What The Heart Bears" - Black Gate (forthcoming)
 
Other Land Of Wind And Ghosts stories:
"The Dragon Path" - Fictitious Force (forthcoming)
"Three Out Of Four" - Sorcerous Signals (forthcoming)
 
Stories in other settings:
"The Unicorn Hunter" - OG's Speculative Fiction #8
"When Winter Came" - ASIM#32 (forthcoming)
"Cold Fire" - Flashing Swords (forthcoming)
"Call Centre" - Necrotic Tissue (forthcoming)


Posted By : Edward Knight - 12/7/2007 2:28 PM
Sorry, I've ignored this thread for a while and come back to find a question posted to me. "Rich" is a relative term. I grew up poor as dirt (only slightly better off now). So my opinion is slanted a bit. I'm not sure if I have a dollar amount in mind. But since you ask, I'd say $200,000 a year is wealthy. People making under $50,000 (household) are really struggling to make ends meet.

IMO, it seems folks making $500,000+ a year pay in lower percentage of income tax than say a person making $50,000. The higher the income the greater the difference. That's not right, if you ask me.


Edward Knight
Editor
Journey Books Publishing
Order our newest anthology, Unparalleled Journeys II, now at:
http://www.journeybookspublishing.com


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 12/7/2007 6:41 PM
tchernabyelo said...
Scott M. Sandridge said...

Not all forms of fascism resembles Nazi Germany exactly.


Well, no, certainly not.   But your earlier post specifically referred to the US turning into Nazi Germany, which is what I was taking issue with.   There's no doubt that there are trends in the US moving towards centralism, but there's equally no doubt that there are trends away from that as well.   Indeed, the more the Republican party moves to align itself with the Neo-Con world-view, the more it loses the support of the more libertarian elements of its base.   There is a real possibility of a significant split in Republican grass-roots support, which might well counter the disadvantage the Democrats have in trying to get Hillary or Barack elected (I do find it deperssing that in the World's Greatest Democracy, a woman is still seen as unelectable by the majority of voters - if Pakistan can have a female head of state, which it id, then surely the US could manage it.
 
I am aware of many of the issue you cite, though some were new to me (the "Amero", for instance, but it is a logical extensian of the NAU planners).   
 
Asking me whether I still want to pay my taxes, however, is a side note.   I don't live in the US.   I do live in the UK, though, where tax money goes to (and flows back from) the European Parliament and Commission.   So I do know something about the operation of federal supra-states, and I freely admit that the EU is NOT run in a fashion that I consider adequately democratic.   
 
But it isn't about where your tax dollars go.   It's about who you choose to elect and how they represent your interests.   

I wasn't saying we're like Nazi Germany yet (if that's how it sounded, I apologize), just heading in that direction. Our current state is eerily similar to that of the Weimer Republic back in '31-'32. Just trade Blackwater USA for the brownshirts and you'll see what I mean (they were employed in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. They also recently received a 6 billion dollar contract to do more "security" operations here in the States).

But I am glad someone other than me on this forum is aware of the NAU plans. I have noticed that people overseas know more about it than people here at home.

"Indeed, the more the Republican party moves to align itself with the Neo-Con world-view, the more it loses the support of the more libertarian elements of its base."

True. But a lot of people are returning to the Republican party just to vote for Ron Paul, the only repub candidate with Libertarian values (He ran once before as a Libertarian back in '88). The Libertarian Party, Constitution Party, and Green Party have endorsed him and said they won't run a candidate if he gets the Republican nomination (instead they'll encourage all their party members to vote for him).

Quick question: what do you know about the fractional reserve system used by central banks?


Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : BethS - 12/8/2007 11:55 AM
EdK said...
Sorry, I've ignored this thread for a while and come back to find a question posted to me. "Rich" is a relative term. I grew up poor as dirt (only slightly better off now). So my opinion is slanted a bit. I'm not sure if I have a dollar amount in mind. But since you ask, I'd say $200,000 a year is wealthy. People making under $50,000 (household) are really struggling to make ends meet.

IMO, it seems folks making $500,000+ a year pay in lower percentage of income tax than say a person making $50,000. The higher the income the greater the difference. That's not right, if you ask me.

 
As you say, it's relative. To me, $200K a year is well-off, but not wealthy. Wealthy is in excess of a million a year, with stocks and assets that provide additional income on top of that.
 
Be that as it may, if that $500K a year you mention is salary, you'd better believe they pay a high percentage in income tax. Income taxes do NOT get lower when the salary goes up.
 
~Beth

Posted By : BethS - 12/8/2007 12:00 PM
tchernabyelo said...
I do find it deperssing that in the World's Greatest Democracy, a woman is still seen as unelectable by the majority of voters

Not a woman -- that woman. (Hillary). People just flatly dislike her, for reasons that have nothing whatever to do with her being a woman. (Though the shrill voice and cackling laugh don't help matters, I suppose.)

Get the right woman running for president and she'd have as good a chance as any male candidate.

~Beth


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 12/8/2007 4:51 PM
BethS said...
tchernabyelo said...
I do find it deperssing that in the World's Greatest Democracy, a woman is still seen as unelectable by the majority of voters

Not a woman -- that woman. (Hillary). People just flatly dislike her, for reasons that have nothing whatever to do with her being a woman. (Though the shrill voice and cackling laugh don't help matters, I suppose.)

Get the right woman running for president and she'd have as good a chance as any male candidate.

~Beth

I agree %110. I would love to vote for a female President. But not enough to want 4-8 more years of the Bush/Clinton monarchy. Those two families have screwed up our country enough, thank you very much.


Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : tchernabyelo - 12/9/2007 12:47 PM
Heaven forfend anyone with a shrill voice or cackling laugh should be trusted as President...

So, who is "the right woman", and whence will she (eventually) appear? Condi? Nancy? There must be other high-profile feamle politicians in so progressive a country as the US, I guess must be some kind of media bias that I never get to hear about them.

I'm tired of hearing people talk the talk about how the US is a country of equal opportunity for all at all levels. I'd like to see it walk the walk one of these old days.


Brian Dolton
 
Yi Qin stories:
"The Box Of Beautiful Things" - IGMS#3
"The Man Who Was Never Afraid" - Abyss and Apex #20
"Where No Wind Blows" - Staffs & Starships #2 (forthcoming)
"What The Sea Refuses" - Black Gate (forthcoming)
"At Blue Crane Falls" - Abyss and Apex (forthcoming)
"What The Heart Bears" - Black Gate (forthcoming)
 
Other Land Of Wind And Ghosts stories:
"The Dragon Path" - Fictitious Force (forthcoming)
"Three Out Of Four" - Sorcerous Signals (forthcoming)
 
Stories in other settings:
"The Unicorn Hunter" - OG's Speculative Fiction #8
"When Winter Came" - ASIM#32 (forthcoming)
"Cold Fire" - Flashing Swords (forthcoming)
"Call Centre" - Necrotic Tissue (forthcoming)


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 12/9/2007 2:17 PM

If Naomi Wolf was running for President (and Ron Paul wasn't), I'd vote for her, despite the fact that half her political views would make her likely to run as a Democrat. Unlike "it takes a village" Hitlery, she actually has character and integrity.

Plus she's hot. devil

But most importantly: she's not a CFR member and Bilderberg pawn.


Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : BethS - 12/9/2007 9:48 PM
tchernabyelo said...


So, who is "the right woman", and whence will she (eventually) appear?

 
Your guess is as good as mine.
 
What matters is electing someone who's intelligent, wise, and has integrity, and to heck with race or gender, neither of which have anything to do with a contender's qualifications for the job.
 
~Beth
 
 

Posted By : BethS - 12/10/2007 2:34 PM
tchernabyelo said...
Heaven forfend anyone with a shrill voice or cackling laugh should be trusted as President...

 

 
Well, a primal scream ruled out Howard Dean...
 
~Beth

Posted By : H.P. Lovesauce - 12/10/2007 2:37 PM
tchernabyelo said...
I'm tired of hearing people talk the talk about how the US is a country of equal opportunity for all at all levels. I'd like to see it walk the walk one of these old days.
If it ever tried walking the walk, its legs would snap off at the knees.
 
There are some very pretty lies America tells about itself; the problem is too many Americans currently believe them, and the percentage of the duped is only getting higher.

Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 12/10/2007 8:34 PM
Well, we are talking about a country where the majority don't even understand (or possibly even read) their own Bill of Rights. Yes, the Founders are turning in their gaves as we speak.
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 12/17/2007 12:04 AM
W00T!!
VIEW IMAGE
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=85856065&blogID=338773914&Mytoken=6852B609-5B12-4510-8E25CDD71BC8501D70207868

Yep. I'm still good at picking the winners.
 
Here's my prediction:
 
Obama wins the Dems and Ron Paul wins the Repubs.


Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : tchernabyelo - 12/17/2007 9:44 AM
BethS said...
What matters is electing someone who's intelligent, wise, and has integrity, and to heck with race or gender, neither of which have anything to do with a contender's qualifications for the job.
 
~Beth
 
 
No, they don't.
 
But if you're supposed to elect someone who's "intelligent, wise and has integrity" then can someone explain to me just WTF that buffoon Dubya is doing in the White House?   Because he is MANIFESTLY none of these things.   He IS effective and a convenient front for certain interest groups (hawkish neocons and corporatists), but his presence shows, surely, that it is "issues" and (dare I say it) "principles" that people vote on, not the actual competence of the individual - and yet people will rule out certain people as "unelectable" because they have a shrieky laugh, or a skin tone that doesn't quite have a high enough albedo.  


Brian Dolton
 
Yi Qin stories:
"The Box Of Beautiful Things" - IGMS#3
"The Man Who Was Never Afraid" - Abyss and Apex #20
"Where No Wind Blows" - Staffs & Starships #2 (forthcoming)
"What The Sea Refuses" - Black Gate (forthcoming)
"At Blue Crane Falls" - Abyss and Apex (forthcoming)
"What The Heart Bears" - Black Gate (forthcoming)
 
Other Land Of Wind And Ghosts stories:
"The Dragon Path" - Fictitious Force (forthcoming)
"Three Out Of Four" - Sorcerous Signals (forthcoming)
 
Stories in other settings:
"The Unicorn Hunter" - OG's Speculative Fiction #8
"When Winter Came" - ASIM#32 (forthcoming)
"Cold Fire" - Flashing Swords (forthcoming)
"Call Centre" - Necrotic Tissue (forthcoming)


Posted By : BethS - 12/17/2007 10:51 AM
 
Here's my prediction:
 
Obama wins the Dems and Ron Paul wins the Repubs.

Well, anything can happen, but I'm real, real doubtful about the Ron Paul prediction. He has some avid fans but his support is not that widespread.
 
~Beth

Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 12/17/2007 8:22 PM

80,000 volunteers in MeetUp groups all over the cauntry as well as U.S. citizens overseas. More than all the volunteers of the other candidates in both parties added together.

Don't follow the poll numbers the TVs showing. They're fixed. I've seen the evidence and know from personal experience.

 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : BethS - 12/18/2007 12:33 PM
For anyone who's interested, Ron Paul is going to be a guest on the Glenn Beck show tonight (CNN Headline News), for the full hour. 7:00 EST, then repeats at 9 and midnight.
 
~Beth

Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 12/18/2007 5:56 PM

Cool!

Glenn Beck is a perplexing fellow. On the one hand, he praises RPs libertarian views, but on the other hand he called RPs supporters "terrorists," and has pretty much smeared him off and on. Who knows?

 

Either way, it'll be an interesting interview.

 
Which lich fell in the ditch?


Posted By : Edward Knight - 12/20/2007 4:28 PM
I've read over all the major candidates websites. I've listened to most of them speak on TV. I've read the media views...

I've come to the conclusion there is no "good" candidate running for the presidency. We're forced with making a choice between the lesser of evils. I don't think any of these clowns will make a fit president. If the current list of hopefuls (from either platform) is the best this country can come up with then we're in for another rough four years.

I've always preached that Americans should exercise the right to vote, but what do you do if you don't like any of the choices.

I'm ready for a third party candidate. I want one who is going to get us out of the Middle East and who is serious about the environment and moving our country away from fossil fuel dependenc--quickly. I want a candidate that will initiate some kind of universal health plan that will work. I want a candidate who will make a real difference when it comes to getting all the illegal aliens out of our country. I want a candidate who will save and strengthen social security. I want a candidate who will push for real tax reform (Fairtax ain't gonna cut it). On top of that I want a candidate that at least comes across as a person of integrity in both his/her personal and professional life.

The current lot is just a bunch of rich Washington insiders. I don't TRUST any of them. What a sad state of affairs for our country.


Edward Knight
Editor
Journey Books Publishing
Order our newest anthology, Unparalleled Journeys II, now at:
http://www.journeybookspublishing.com


Posted By : Scott M. Sandridge - 12/20/2007 6:51 PM

"The real truth of the matter is that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government since the days of Andrew Jackson" -- Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1933

"The refusal of King George III to allow the colonies to operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, was probably the prime cause of the revolution." -- Benjamin Franklin

"I believe that banking insitutions are more dangerous than standing armies...if the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency...the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of their property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." -- Thomas Jefferson

"If you want to remain slaves of the bankers and pay for the costs of your own slavery, let them continue to create money and control the nation's credit" - Sir Josiah Stamp.

"The Morgan interests took advantage...to precipitate the panic [of 1907] guiding it shrewdly as it progressed" -- Frederik Allen, Life Magazine
 
 
One year after the 1913 Federal Reserve Act was passed (allegedly to prevent money panics like 1907), Woodrow Wilson wrote in regret:
 
"Our great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men...who necessarily, by reason of their own limitations, chill and check and destroy economic freedom.
 
We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world--no government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men."
 
 
"A world banking system was being set up here...a superstate controlled by international bankers...acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. The Fed has usurped the government." --Congressman Louis McFadden
 
The public was told that the Federal Reserve System was an economic stablilizer and that inflations and crises were a thing of the past. Well, we all know that the Great Depression proved that wrong.
 
"Under the Federal Reserve Act, panics are scientifically created. The present panic is the first scientifically created one, worked out as we work a mathematical figure." --Congressman Charles Lindbergh, during the 1921 Money Panic (what we today call recessions)
 
 
After the 1929 crash that caused the Great Depression, Congressman McFadden, began bringing Impeachment proceedings against the Federal Reserve Board, saying:
 
"It was a carefully contrived occurance. International bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair, so that they might emerge the rulers of us all."
 
After two previous assassination attempts, McFadden was poisoned at a banquet before he could push for the Impeachment.
 
 
I could go on and on and on about the problems with having the Federal Reserve (and lets not forget the fact that it's unconstitutional to have a privately owned central bank in control of the money supply, for the very reasons Franklin, Jefferson, and other founders stated). But, to bring things up to the point I want to make:
 
Absolutely nothing will change in this country as long as the FRS exists, because this country is going in the exact direction the private owners of the FRS want, and they have our government in their pockets.
 
"Give me the power to control a nation's currency, and I care not who makes its laws." -- Mayer Amschel Rothchilde



Distant Passages: Volume 1
 
Which lich fell in the ditch?