|
|
|
|
|
| SFReader Forums > SFReader > Ask The Expert > Terraform Mars | Forum Quick Jump
|
 |  Lyn Adopt

       Date Joined Sep 2007 Total Posts : 1278 | Posted 5/13/2008 12:12 PM (GMT -4) |   | | | |
    |  Edward Knight Jack of all Trades and Master of None

       Date Joined Jan 2004 Total Posts : 1038 | Posted 4/16/2008 4:15 PM (GMT -4) |   | I think Fred has the right idea. If you create more atmosphere then the planet surface will warm. After the surface warms you'd need a supply of water. That too could come from the polar caps. Once you have warmth and water you could introduce some plant life. The plants produce oxygen. Then you could introduce some animal life (probably microscopic first and work your way up). In a few thousand years you might have something.
I seems more likely to me that it would be easier to create some kind of biosphere on the Martian surface. It would be easier to work within a smaller space than terraforming the whole planet.
I'd build a space station orbiting Mars first. Then we could fly materials to the International Space Station by shuttle. Then ship to the Mars Station. Then shuttle it down again. As soon as you have a dome made from all those plexiglas plates then you can start building an atmosphere within. Then the idea of drilling might be helpful to tap into whatever geothermal warmth is available (could also be a source of power.)
Yeah, I like the idea of bubbles on Mars better than terraforming the whole place at once. That way we can colonize like the days of old. All the religious factions could build their own bubble. All the different national and racial groups could have bubbles. Before long it would be just like good old Earth. People killing each other, rockets flying, invasions, abuse, trade agreements, treaties, government collapse, spies, armies, social issues---politics as usual. A whole planet full of bubbles where nobody gets along would make for some great scifi. Edward Knight Editor Journey Books Publishing
| | Back to Top | | |
  |  Frank Adept

       Date Joined Aug 2005 Total Posts : 628 | Posted 4/16/2008 4:03 PM (GMT -4) |   |
Jordan Lapp said...
Where did you get that we need to restart the planet's core? Mars has a magnetic field, and therefore has a molten core.
Mars' magnetic field is very weak. The easiest answer to this is that Mars' core is mostly cold, if not completely so. Mars was more geologocally active in it's distant past, made obvious by the numerous (and very large) volcanos that dot its face. A few of these vocanos still occasionally sigh very thin clouds of gas. Clearly there is some latent heat trapped beneath the Martian surface, but probably not enough heat to truely revive any of the volcanos so far observed. As far as we can tell right now there are no plate techtonics happening on Mars either, signifying a geologically dead planet.
That means the solar wind is eroding what little is left of Mars' atmosphere, making long term habitation there impractical for life as we know it. But don't take my word for it. Click the links below:
These are all brief articles and I found all of them helpful. | | Back to Top | | |
    |  FredLand Stablehand
        Date Joined Mar 2008 Total Posts : 19 | Posted 3/28/2008 12:16 PM (GMT -4) |   | The CO2 approach has been used before and is a real theory. Nuke the polar ice caps (mostly CO2) to create a greenhouse environment. That heats the planet and creates more atmosphere. Then go for the algea and mold and so forth. That, of course, takes years and years and years.
Fred | | Back to Top | | |
 |  MysticWino anarchist fringe monkey boddhisatva

       Date Joined May 2007 Total Posts : 1565 | Posted 3/14/2008 2:29 PM (GMT -4) |   | | Nope. Sorry. But I think it's more complicated than simply mass-flux. Vulcanism and magnetic fields play into the equation - as well as any other massive bodies near enough to interact in those fields (gravitational and radiational). Why collide? A massive moon with a fairly weak attraction and on an eliptical orbit might eventually shoot off into space. Then a number of posibilities arise from that. Especially considering all the posibilities of where that occurs in relation to the center of the solar system, other planets, stroid fields, etc. And the particular make-up of the moon - living core? dead? ice? plasma? Iron? gas? etc. . . . I love History Channel's "Universe" series!
| | Back to Top | | |
   |  MysticWino anarchist fringe monkey boddhisatva

       Date Joined May 2007 Total Posts : 1565 | Posted 3/7/2008 6:54 PM (GMT -4) |   | | | |
   |  MysticWino anarchist fringe monkey boddhisatva

       Date Joined May 2007 Total Posts : 1565 | Posted 3/7/2008 12:22 PM (GMT -4) |   | | | |
 |  Nathan Jerpe Acolyte

       Date Joined Nov 2007 Total Posts : 216 | Posted 3/6/2008 7:28 PM (GMT -4) |   | | | |
 |  MysticWino anarchist fringe monkey boddhisatva

       Date Joined May 2007 Total Posts : 1565 | Posted 3/6/2008 4:03 PM (GMT -4) |   | | | |
  |  Gustavo Sage

       Date Joined Aug 2007 Total Posts : 1132 | Posted 3/6/2008 2:21 PM (GMT -4) |   | | | |
   | 31 posts in this thread. Viewing Page : 1 2 | | Forum Information | Currently it is Saturday, August 30, 2008 10:10 AM (GMT -4) There are a total of 80,259 posts in 6,342 threads. In the last 3 days there were 29 new threads and 123 reply posts. View Active Threads
| | Who's Online | This forum has 1221 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, tomo99. 17 Guest(s), 0 Registered Member(s) are currently online. Details
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP2 dotNetBB © 2000-2008 (c) SFReader |
|
|
|