|
|
|
|
|
| SFReader Forums > SFReader > Ask The Expert > Definitive help needed | Forum Quick Jump
|
 |  Bill Ward Biblioholic

       Date Joined Jul 2006 Total Posts : 1718 | Posted 11/23/2006 12:08 AM (GMT -5) |   | I don't know enisled and prang.
What was the book?
After looking up enisled I think context clues might have given it away, but what was the usage of prang? A southeast asian temple? | | Back to Top | | |
  |  von Darkmoor Small Press Publisher (and Dancer still)

       Date Joined Dec 2005 Total Posts : 3056 | Posted 11/23/2006 1:38 AM (GMT -5) |   | The book is Ian Cameron Esslemont's Night of Knives, which I have long awaited. If you care to know about it, I just posted my review on my reader-friendly blog
'Enisled' was one of the three I did figure out due to its context, 'caried' and 'machicolations' being the other two.
Now 'prang', that was interesting, as it's the only one I'm still unsure of. My dictionary and Merriam-Webster online both said it meant 'crash, accident' while Wikipedia included what you mentioned, WD - the asian temple spire - as a secondary meaning (I just discovered that, as I had to search around to figure out where you got that from ). It was used in the story as part of an exclamatory remark, like swearing. There is a god named Fener in the tale and the character says something like "What in Fener's prang is going on here?"
There was no accident/crash occuring and they weren't in any temple .. . . seems a tad awkward to me.
And my dear darkbow, you are not a dunce. 270k in finished material does not a dunce make.  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jason M. Waltz ~ Get with it @ www.vondarkmoor.blogspot.com Today! | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ErylRavenwell The Feathered Serpent

       Date Joined Nov 2005 Total Posts : 100 | Posted 11/23/2006 6:48 AM (GMT -5) |   | | None!
But, do you think using such uncommon words in a novel is a good idea? I have one in my novel, "asteism" (meaning gentle irony, which fit the protag like a glove). But I used it because I've yet to find a more widely use synonym for it. If it's trivial, you may as well keep it simple, lest it may sound bombastic.
Beware of words, for they hold a power that can alter the fabric of our minds; intangible words that can summon the dormant predator from the dank recesses of the mind.
~Eryl Ravenwell~
When the Enchantress Whispers to the Beasts
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Bill Ward Biblioholic

       Date Joined Jul 2006 Total Posts : 1718 | Posted 11/23/2006 9:48 AM (GMT -5) |   | In that case Howard I suspect prang is what the great pulpsters would call Fener's manhood.
Didn't know asteism either.
I like to see uncommon words used, but like anything else they need to be used well; they need to suit the tone and pace of the peice, they shouldn't carry the entire meaning of a phrase and leave the reader without context clues, and they shouldn't seem just like an author's attempt to show off or like a thesaurus pull. | | Back to Top | | |
   |  von Darkmoor Small Press Publisher (and Dancer still)

       Date Joined Dec 2005 Total Posts : 3056 | Posted 11/23/2006 11:37 AM (GMT -5) |   | Ding ding ding! We have our winners!
Robert is correct with machicolations - I figured it out due to its context but I still looked it up to get an exact definition.
GW is correct with verdigrised/oxidization - the green discoloring on brass and bronze, in this case a warrior's helm; and nictitated/to open and close - first word in the definition is 'blinked'. When reading, I was wrong on my guess of verdigrised and close on nictitated but blinked would have worked so much better.
Quetz - I have no problem with uncommon words and, as mentioned, the reader is usually able to discern their meaning through the way in which they are used. WD hits it on the head - how does the impressive show of verbiage come across to the reader? In this book, Esslemont uses lots of overly-large or uncommon words which I know and use myself but realize they are bigger words than many readers ever see (just had first hand experience with that in one of my shorts someone asked to read). But when I've hit my third word, one of which I guessed wrongly at, another of which I was vaguely close with my guess, and a third I wasn't sure of at all, all in the first two pages I suspect the author is trying too hard to impress me.
I like a good new word, learning it and adding it to my toolkit; I don't enjoy being schooled in my entertainment reading - it disrupts the story when I have to reread context to get the gist of it or set down the book to find a dictionary.
And I'll tell you right now, I'm sure glad I don't have to swear by an god's manhood! I won't be getting near any prang for a long time to come!
As someone above has so aptly stated . . . "Beware of words, for they hold a power that can alter the fabric of our minds. . ." ~Eryl Ravenwell~ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jason M. Waltz ~ Get with it @ www.vondarkmoor.blogspot.com Today! | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ErylRavenwell The Feathered Serpent

       Date Joined Nov 2005 Total Posts : 100 | Posted 11/24/2006 1:47 AM (GMT -5) |   | |
Now I remember where I've come across this word before. Bow Vs Crossbow. The crossbow was easier to fire through the machicolations, especially by the starvation weakened, besieged troops.
* scribbles the word down in my notebook, as well as enisled (can come handy). Eye the rest with contempt*
Rob Santa said...Hah! I knew the same list as GW. I'll go you one better; I've used them in my writing. And sorry...machicolations are the openings in a castle wall that archers used to fire at invaders.
Beware of words, for they hold a power that can alter the fabric of our minds; intangible words that can summon the dormant predator from the dank recesses of the mind.
~Eryl Ravenwell~
When the Enchantress Whispers to the Beasts
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  ErylRavenwell The Feathered Serpent

       Date Joined Nov 2005 Total Posts : 100 | Posted 11/24/2006 2:07 AM (GMT -5) |   | |
I agree. If a word is worth its salt, there is no reason why it shouldn't be used, even if it is uncommon. Besides, a reader may effortlessly guess the meaning of a word like "enisled" by looking at the context the word is used. But, hey, if a writer randomly starts using words like "discombobulated" (confused) in every paragraph, fat chance I'm going to toss this book into the rubbish bin.
Quetz - I have no problem with uncommon words and, as mentioned, the reader is usually able to discern their meaning through the way in which they are used. WD hits it on the head - how does the impressive show of verbiage come across to the reader? In this book, Esslemont uses lots of overly-large or uncommon words which I know and use myself but realize they are bigger words than many readers ever see (just had first hand experience with that in one of my shorts someone asked to read). But when I've hit my third word, one of which I guessed wrongly at, another of which I was vaguely close with my guess, and a third I wasn't sure of at all, all in the first two pages I suspect the author is trying too hard to impress me. I like a good new word, learning it and adding it to my toolkit; I don't enjoy being schooled in my entertainment reading - it disrupts the story when I have to reread context to get the gist of it or set down the book to find a dictionary. And I'll tell you right now, I'm sure glad I don't have to swear by an god's manhood! I won't be getting near any prang for a long time to come! As someone above has so aptly stated . . . "Beware of words, for they hold a power that can alter the fabric of our minds. . ." ~Eryl Ravenwell~
Beware of words, for they hold a power that can alter the fabric of our minds; intangible words that can summon the dormant predator from the dank recesses of the mind.
~Eryl Ravenwell~
When the Enchantress Whispers to the Beasts
| | Back to Top | | |
  |  Bill Ward Biblioholic

       Date Joined Jul 2006 Total Posts : 1718 | Posted 11/25/2006 11:26 PM (GMT -5) |   | Don't tell me you sword and sorcery fans didn't know serried? I'd actually not consider that all that uncommon a word.
And I'm thinking this use of prang falls a bit in the slangy side of things, so I wouldn't expect to see it in a dictionary.
caried is one I'm not 100% sure of now that I think about it, I assumed it was a form of 'carious,' so would decribe something rotten and/or holed. what did your dictionary say howard? | | Back to Top | | |
    |  Bill Ward Biblioholic

       Date Joined Jul 2006 Total Posts : 1718 | Posted 11/26/2006 11:27 PM (GMT -5) |   | | | |
   |  Bill Ward Biblioholic

       Date Joined Jul 2006 Total Posts : 1718 | Posted 11/27/2006 4:20 PM (GMT -5) |   | | I agree that a word that breaks a reader's focus in a story is a bad one, whether it's a common or uncommon word. But I wouldn't say writing is only about communicating stories and imagery, its also about language and rhythm and mood, and sometimes obscure, archaic, and uncommon words are the best fit for a particular piece. | | Back to Top | | |
   |  STForstner Acolyte

       Date Joined Nov 2005 Total Posts : 384 | Posted 11/28/2006 7:01 PM (GMT -5) |   | | | |
   | 34 posts in this thread. Viewing Page : 1 2 | | Forum Information | Currently it is Friday, November 21, 2008 1:55 AM (GMT -5) There are a total of 84,603 posts in 6,892 threads. In the last 3 days there were 14 new threads and 212 reply posts. View Active Threads
| | Who's Online | This forum has 1307 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, David Cohen. 11 Guest(s), 0 Registered Member(s) are currently online. Details
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP2 dotNetBB © 2000-2008 (c) SFReader |
|
| |